Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1410-1418 (2012)
Abstract |
The dominant view of the ventral and dorsal visual systems is that they subserve perception and action. De Wit, Van der Kamp, and Masters suggested that a more fundamental distinction might exist between the nature of information exploited by the systems. The present study distinguished between these accounts by asking participants to perform delayed matching , pointing and perceptual judgment responses to masked Müller–Lyer stimuli of varying length. Matching and pointing responses of participants who could not perceptually judge stimulus length at brief durations remained sensitive to veridical stimulus length , but not the illusion , which was effective at long durations. Distinct thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up were thus evident irrespective of whether perception or action responses were required. It was concluded that the dorsal and ventral systems may be delineated fundamentally by fast egocentric- and slower allocentric information pick up, respectively
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.008 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
When Does Action Resist Visual Illusions?Nicola Bruno - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (9):379-382.
Conscious Vs Unconscious Processes: The Case of Vision.Bruce Bridgeman - 1992 - Theory and Psychology 2:73-88.
Differential Effects of a Visual Illusion on Online Visual Guidance in a Stable Environment and Online Adjustments to Perturbations.Simone R. Caljouw, John van der Kamp, Moniek Lijster & Geert J. P. Savelsbergh - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1135-1143.
The Dorsal Stream and the Visual Horizon.Michael Madary - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):423-438.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Egocentrism, Allocentrism, and Asperger Syndrome.Uta Frith & Frederique de Vignemont - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (4):719-738.
Grasping Spatial Relationships: Failure to Demonstrate Allocentric Visual Coding in a Patient with Visual Form Agnosia.H. Chris Dijkerman, A. David Milner & David P. Carey - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):424-437.
The Complex Interplay Between Three-Dimensional Egocentric and Allocentric Spatial Representation.David M. Kaplan - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):553-554.
Individual Differences in the Encoding Processes of Egocentric and Allocentric Survey Knowledge.Wen Wen, Toru Ishikawa & Takao Sato - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (1):176-192.
Space in the Brain: Different Neural Substrates for Allocentric and Egocentric Frames of Reference.Melvyn A. Goodale & K. Murphy - 2000 - In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Magnitude of Gravitoinertial Force, an Independent Variable in Egocentric Visual Localization of the Horizontal.Earl F. Miller & Ashton Graybiel - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):452.
The Efficiency of Utilization of Visual Information and the Effects of Stress.Austin Jones - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (6):428.
Visual Demonstratives.Mohan Matthen - 2012 - In Athanasios Raftopoulos & Peter Machamer (eds.), Perception, Realism and the Problem of Reference. Cambridge University Press.
An Investigation of the "Randomness" of Threshold Measurements.Michael Wertheimer - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):294.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-18
Total views
14 ( #731,548 of 2,504,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,814 )
2013-12-18
Total views
14 ( #731,548 of 2,504,814 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,814 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads