The Religious Significance of the Ontological Argument: PHILIP E.DEVINE

Religious Studies 11 (1):97-116 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It seems clear that the ontological argument can no longer be dismissed as a silly fallacy. The dogma of the impossibility of necessary existence is seriously threatened by the case of necessary existential truths in mathematics, and as for the claim that the ontological argument must beg the question, since by mentioning God in the premise his existence is presupposed, it is undermined by the fact that we often refer to things—Hamlet for instance— we do not for a moment think exist. The doctrine that existence is not a property , insofar as it does not reduce to one of the foregoing points, is very murky, for the sense in which ‘red’ is a predicate and ‘exists’ is not has never been clearly defined. Moreover, the way many believers hold that ‘God exists’ is immune to empirical refutation strongly suggests that we are dealing here with an analytic statement, which is just what the ontological argument should be expected to produce. It seems in order, then, to conduct theological discussion under the supposition that the argument is in fact sound



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
Does St Anselm Beg the Question?Philip E. Devine - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (193):271-281.
How is the question 'is existence a predicate?' Relevant to the ontological argument?J. William Forgie - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):117 - 133.
Reality and existence in Anselm.Stephen Priest - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (4):461–462.
The ontological argument and the devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
How is the question ‘Is Existence a Predicate?’ relevant to the ontological argument?J. William Forgie - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):117-133.
Ontological Argument in Leibniz's Philosophy.Ali Tahiri - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 39.
Does Anselm beg the question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.


Added to PP

19 (#750,145)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references