Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):153–169 (2007)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
We argue in this essay that (1) the embryo is an irredeemably ambiguous entity and its ambiguity casts serious doubt on the arguments claiming its full protection or, at least, its protection against its use as a means fo research, (2) those who claim the embryo should be protected as "one of us" are committed to a position even they do not uphold in their practices, (3) views that defend the protection of the embryo in virtue of its potentiality to become a person fail, and (4) the embryo does not have any rights or interests to be protected. Given that many are willing to treat the embryo as a means in other practices, and that human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research holds the potential to benefit many people, one cannot but conclude that hESC research is permissible and, because of its immense promise for alleviating human even obligatory
|
Keywords | stem cell research Moral status Embryo embryonic stem cells |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00480.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 31 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Moral Uncertainty in Bioethical Argumentation: A New Understanding of the Pro-Life View on Early Human Embryos.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (6):441-457.
The Argument From Potentiality in the Embryo Protection Debate: Finally “Depotentialized”?Marco Stier & Bettina Schoene-Seifert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):19-27.
Embryo Experimentation: Is There a Case for Moving Beyond the ‘14-Day Rule’.Grant Castelyn - 2020 - Monash Bioethics Review 38 (2):181-196.
Avoiding the Potentiality Trap: Thinking About the Moral Status of Synthetic Embryos.Monika Piotrowska - forthcoming - Monash Bioethics Review.
Morally Relevant Potential.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):268-271.
View all 21 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Stem Cell Research as Innovation: Expanding the Ethical and Policy Conversation.Rebecca Dresser - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):332-341.
Compromise and Moral Complicity in the Embryonic Stem Cell Debate.Katrien Devolder & John Harris - 2005 - In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Rescuing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: The Possibility of Embryo Reconstitution After Stem Cell Derivation.Katrien Devolder & Christopher M. Ward - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):245–263.
Embryo Politics: Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies.Thomas F. Banchoff - 2011 - Cornell University Press.
Stemming the Tide of Normalisation: An Expanded Feminist Analysis of the Ethics and Social Impact of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
The Ethics of Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Catholic Viewpoint.Richard M. Doerflinger - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):137-150.
Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights.A. -K. M. Andersson - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.
The Lady Vanishes: What’s Missing From the Stem Cell Debate.Donna L. Dickenson - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):43-54.
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
158 ( #74,142 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,511 )
2009-01-28
Total views
158 ( #74,142 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads