MBA education, business ethics and the case for shareholder value

Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):199-205 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The appropriate MBA curriculum has been debated for nearly a half century. More recently, critics contend that the emphasis on functional fields in MBA education has incorrectly elevated the importance of shareholder value resulting in unethical behavior. Although some criticism of MBA programs has merit, shareholder wealth maximization should remain the dominant management objective because it is relatively easy to implement and generally consistent with the interests of stakeholders.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Business Ethics Education in China’s MBA Curriculum. [REVIEW]Zhou Zucheng - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 5:261-266.
The limits of shareholder value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Business Ethics Education for MBA Students in China.Zucheng Zhou, Ping Ou & Georges Enderle - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:103-118.
Balancing Ethics and Shareholder Returns.Dennis Proffitt - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 8 (1):181-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#323,481)

6 months
7 (#626,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations.Adam Smith - 1976 - Oxford University Press. Edited by R. H. Campbell, A. S. Skinner & W. B. Todd.
Higher Education for Business.R. A. Gordon & J. E. Howell - 1960 - British Journal of Educational Studies 9 (1):91-91.
Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?Bruce Anderson - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):217-219.

Add more references