Authors
Michael Devitt
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
Linguists take the intuitive judgments of speakers to be good evidence for a grammar. Why? The Chomskian answer is that they are derived by a rational process from a representation of linguistic rules in the language faculty. The paper takes a different view. It argues for a naturalistic and non-Cartesian view of intuitions in general. They are empirical central-processor responses to phenomena differing from other such responses only in being immediate and fairly unreflective. Applying this to linguistic intuitions yields an explanation of their evidential role without any appeal to the representation of rules. Introduction The evidence for linguistic theories A tension in the linguists' view of intuitions Intuitions in general Linguistic intuitions Comparison of the modest explanation with the standard Cartesian explanation A nonstandard Cartesian explanation of the role of intuitions? Must linguistics explain intuitions? Conclusion
Keywords Cartesianism  Intuition  Language  Linguistics  Phenomena
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axl017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

View all 94 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intuition.Joel Pust - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Philosophical Expertise.Jennifer Ellen Nado - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (9):631-641.
Experimental Semantics.Michael Devitt - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):418 - 435.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?: Reply to Collins.Barry C. Smith - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
Ignorance Radicalized.Gergo Somodi - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):140-156.
Ignorance of Language.Michael Devitt - 2006 - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Intuitions: The Discrete Voice of Competence.Nenad Miščević - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):523-548.
Linguistic Intuitions.Gareth Fitzgerald - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):123-160.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
457 ( #21,021 of 2,519,515 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,372 of 2,519,515 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes