Abstract
A medical information commons is a networked data environment utilized for research and clinical applications. At three deliberations across the U.S., we engaged 75 adults in two-day facilitated discussions on the ethical and social issues inherent to sharing data with an MIC. Deliberants made recommendations regarding opt-in consent, transparent data policies, public representation on MIC governing boards, and strict data security and privacy protection. Community engagement is critical to earning the public's trust.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1073110519840486
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.Lynn J. Frewer & Gene Rowe - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (2):251-290.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of General Practice and Advertising.R. D. Colman - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (2):86-93.
Tragedies Without Commons.Christopher Knapp - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (1):81-94.
The Importance of Being Trustworthy.Derek Sellman - 2006 - Nursing Ethics 13 (2):105-115.
Fares and Free Riders on the Information Highway.C. Martin Rosen & Gabrielle M. Carr - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1439-1445.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
25 ( #453,155 of 2,498,993 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,993 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes