Machines, logic and quantum physics

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):265-283 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

§1. Mathematics and the physical world. Genuine scientific knowledge cannot be certain, nor can it be justified a priori. Instead, it must be conjectured, and then tested by experiment, and this requires it to be expressed in a language appropriate for making precise, empirically testable predictions. That language is mathematics.This in turn constitutes a statement about what the physical world must be like if science, thus conceived, is to be possible. As Galileo put it, “the universe is written in the language of mathematics”. Galileo's introduction of mathematically formulated, testable theories into physics marked the transition from the Aristotelian conception of physics, resting on supposedly necessary a priori principles, to its modern status as a theoretical, conjectural and empirical science. Instead of seeking an infallible universal mathematical design, Galilean science usesmathematics to express quantitative descriptions of an objective physical reality. Thus mathematics became the language in which we express our knowledge of the physical world — a language that is not only extraordinarily powerful and precise, but also effective in practice. Eugene Wigner referred to “the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the physical sciences”. But is this effectiveness really unreasonable or miraculous?Numbers, sets, groups and algebras have an autonomous reality quite independent of what the laws of physics decree, and the properties of these mathematical structures can be just as objective as Plato believed they were.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradigms & paradoxes.Robert Garland Colodny - 1972 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press. Edited by Arthur Fine.
Only If Quanta Had Logic.James H. McGrath - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:268 - 275.
Quantum logic is alive ∧ (it is true ∨ it is false).Michael Dickson - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S274 - S287.
Modern physics and problems of knowledge.Paul M. Clark (ed.) - 1981 - Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
122 (#142,922)

6 months
21 (#116,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rossella Lupacchini
University of Bologna

Citations of this work

Worlds in the Everett interpretation.David Wallace - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (4):637-661.
On the Significance of the Gottesman–Knill Theorem.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1):91-121.
Hypercomputation and the Physical Church‐Turing Thesis.Paolo Cotogno - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):181-223.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem.Alan Turing - 1936 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42 (1):230-265.
The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
Mechanical procedures and mathematical experience.Wilfried Sieg - 1994 - In Alexander George (ed.), Mathematics and Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 71--117.
Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring.P. Shor - 1994 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science:124-134.

Add more references