What Can’t We Do with Economics?

Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ainslie’s Picoeconomics presents an ingenious theory, based on a remarkably simple basic law about the rate of discounting the value of future prospects, which explains a vast number of psychological phenomena. Hyperbolic discount rates result in changes in the ranking of interests as they get closer in time. Thus quasi-homuncular “interests” situated at different times compete within the person. In this paper I first defend the generality of scope of Ainslie’s model, which ranges over several personal and subpersonal levels of psychological analysis. I raise a problem which results from the temporal relativity of assessments of value, and affects the possibility of objective values. Finally, I offer one example of a form of time-related irrationality on which Ainslie’s scheme does not seem to have a grip, namely one which relates not to a situation’s relative position in time, but to its temporal (‘progressive’ or ‘perfect’) temporal aspect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
Picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 1992 - Behavior and Philosophy 20:89-94.
Freud and Picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 1989 - Behavior and Philosophy 17 (1):11.
Picoeconomics. [REVIEW]Kent Bach - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):981-983.
A bazaar of opinions mostly fit within picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):664-670.
Freud and picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 1989 - Behaviorism 17 (1):11-19.
The Subjectivity of Habitus.Bret Chandler - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):469-491.
Weakness of Will and the Free-Rider Problem.Jon Elster - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (2):231-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
7 (#1,201,127)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ronald De Sousa
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references