Business and Society 60 (8):2136-2174 (2021)

Abstract
The consequences of foreign direct investment for human rights protection are poorly understood. We propose that the impact of FDI varies across industries. In particular, extractive firms in the oil and mining industries go where the resources are located and are bound to such investment, which creates a status quo bias among them when it comes to supporting repressive rulers. The same is not true for nonextractive multinational corporations in manufacturing or services, which can, in comparison, exit problematic countries more easily. We also propose that strong democratic institutions can alleviate negative impacts of extractive FDI on human rights. Using U.S. FDI broken up into extractive and nonextractive industries in 157 host countries, we find support for these propositions.1 Extractive FDI is associated with more human rights abuse, but nonextractive FDI is associated with less abuse, after controlling for other factors, including concerns about endogeneity. We find also that the negative human rights impact of extractive FDI vanishes in countries where democratic institutions are stronger. Our results are robust to a range of alternative estimation techniques.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0007650320928972
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

US Multinationals and Workers’ Rights Globally.Kristin E. Buzun - 1998 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 7 (1):53-58.
US Multinationals and Workers' Rights Globally.Kristin E. Buzun - 1998 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 7 (1):53–58.
Human Rights Instruments.Linda Camp Keith - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Values Priority and Human Rights Policy.Hong Xiao - 2005 - Journal of Human Values 11 (2):87-102.
On Empirical Realism and the Defining of Theoretical Terms.Kathleen L. Slaney - 2001 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):132-152.
Minimalism, Determinacy, and Human Rights.Robert Mark Simpson - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 34 (1):149-169.
The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights: An Overview.Rowan Cruft, S. Matthew Liao & Massimo Renzo - 2015 - In Rowan Cruft, S. Matthew Liao & Massimo Renzo (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-15

Total views
1 ( #1,515,470 of 2,461,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes