Dissertation, University of British Columbia (2015)

Authors
C. Tyler DesRoches
Arizona State University
Abstract
This dissertation undertakes a philosophical analysis of “natural capital” and argues that this concept has prompted economists to view Nature in a radically novel manner. Formerly, economists referred to Nature and natural products as a collection of inert materials to be drawn upon in isolation and then rearranged by human agents to produce commodities. More recently, nature is depicted as a collection of active, modifiable, and economically valuable processes, often construed as ecosystems that produce marketable goods and services gratis. Nature is depicted as consisting of various unproduced mechanisms or “natural machines” that are first discovered and then channeled so as to serve human ends. In short, nature as an ideal is a kind of garden that is characterized by natural objects purposefully arranged by intentional human agents. This dissertation first lays out working definitions of the key terms, such as capital and Nature, and then traces the historical roots of natural capital in the writings of eminent classical political economists, such as Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx. I then examine the question of substitutes for “critical natural capital”, and argue that the preservation paradox is warranted: no one can restore or preserve a part of Nature without turning it into an artifact. Following the recent work of Debra Satz and Michael Sandel, I finish my dissertation by situating the question of natural capital in the broader context of whether some goods should not be for sale, particularly those I define as Basic Ecological Goods.  
Keywords Philosophy of Economics  History of Economics  Natural Capital  Critical Natural Capital  Sustainability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.

View all 77 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Preservation Paradox and Natural Capital.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice 101058 (N/A):1-7.
On the Concept and Conservation of Critical Natural Capital.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (N/A):1-22.
Some Truths Don’T Matter: The Case of Strong Sustainability.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (2):184-196.
What is Lost Through No Net Loss.John O’Neill - forthcoming - Economics and Philosophy:1-20.
The Scientific Discovery of 'Natural Capital': The Production of Catalytic Antibodies.M. Ben-Chaim - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (3):413-433.
Economics and Culture.David Throsby - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
The Dialectics of Nature and Dialectics in Capital.B. G. Kuznetsov - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):43-62.
The Dialectics of Nature and Dialectics in Capital.B. G. Kuznetsov - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):43-62.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-04

Total views
226 ( #50,807 of 2,520,967 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #13,871 of 2,520,967 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes