The epistemological foundations of data science: a critical analysis

Abstract

The modern abundance and prominence of data has led to the development of “data science” as a new field of enquiry, along with a body of epistemological reflections upon its foundations, methods, and consequences. This article provides a systematic analysis and critical review of significant open problems and debates in the epistemology of data science. We propose a partition of the epistemology of data science into the following five domains: (i) the constitution of data science; (ii) the kind of enquiry that it identifies; (iii) the kinds of knowledge that data science generates; (iv) the nature and epistemological significance of “black box” problems; and (v) the relationship between data science and the philosophy of science more generally.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Data objects for knowing.Fred Fonseca - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (1):195-204.
Coal to Diamonds.Johannes Lenhard - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):583-586.
Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence from Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science.William F. Brewer & Clark A. Chinn - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304 - 313.
Scientific perspectivism: A philosopher of science's response to the challenge of big data biology.Werner Callebaut - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1):69-80.
Reflexões acerca de Big Data e Cognição.Joao Kogler - 2020 - In Mariana C. Broens Edna A. De Souza (ed.), Big Data: Implicações Epistemológicas e Éticas. São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Filoczar. pp. 145-157.
Radical empiricism and machine learning research.Judea Pearl - 2021 - Journal of Causal Inference 9 (1):78-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-13

Downloads
2,636 (#2,845)

6 months
839 (#1,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Causality.Judea Pearl - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 33 references / Add more references