Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256 (2010)

Authors
Lane DesAutels
Missouri Western State University
Abstract
In this short discussion note, I discuss whether any of the generalizations made in biology should be construed as laws. Specifically, I examine a strategy offered by Elliot Sober ( 1997 ) and supported by Mehmet Elgin ( 2006 ) to reformulate certain biological generalizations so as to eliminate their contingency, thereby allowing them to count as laws. I argue that this strategy entails a conception of laws that is unacceptable on two counts: (1) Sober and Elgin’s approach allows the possibility of formulating laws describing any biological phenomenon whatsoever; and (2) on Sober and Elgin’s view, any interesting contrast between so-called laws and obviously accidental generalizations collapses. I conclude by offering suggestions to refine their view in order to avoid these theoretical problems.
Keywords Laws  Biology  Contingency  Modal Force
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-009-9182-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Biology and a Priori Laws.Mehmet Elgin - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1380--1389.
Mathematical Biology and the Existence of Biological Laws.Mauro Dorato - 2012 - In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer.
Theoretical Modeling and Biological Laws.Gregory Cooper - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):35.
Pragmatic Laws.Sandra D. Mitchell - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):479.
There May Be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, After All.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-09-26

Total views
106 ( #110,640 of 2,508,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes