Response to Martin De Nys

The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):165-174 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to issues raised by Martin De Nys in his article, “Conceiving Divine Transcendence,” dealing with Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? The response focuses especially on the question of religious representation, the issue of the autonomy of philosophy, the issue of creation, the actual practice of Hegel in the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, and Hegel as a contemporary resource for philosophical theology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Peter Hodgson.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):189-200.
Response to Stephen Houlgate.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):175-188.
Hegel’s Concept of God.Martin De Nys - 1983 - The Owl of Minerva 15 (1):107-112.
Hegel and the History of Philosophy.Martin J. De Nys - 1976 - The Owl of Minerva 7 (4):1-5.
Faith, self-transcendence, and reflection.Martin J. De Nys - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (2):121-138.
Public health paternalism—a response to Nys.Stephen Holland - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (3):285-293.
Hegel’s God: Counterfeit or Real?Peter C. Hodgson - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
God in History.Martin J. De Nys - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):404-405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
39 (#301,195)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Desmond
Villanova University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references