Recognition, disrecognition and legitimacy: On the normativity of politics

Thesis Eleven 134 (1):13-27 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Axel Honneth’s recent theory of recognition, as exposed in his book Freedom’s Right. The argument defended here is that Honneth’s approach does not apprehend the normative implications of political conflicts, for it relies on what some critics have called normative history. Against that approach, this paper defends a model of social theory that is not committed to normative presuppositions of analysis. Rather, it seeks to understand how political struggles strive for normative authority. As an illustration of forms of recognition that are alternative to the ones Honneth calls normative, the paper builds on an example from Brazilian society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Terrorism, Hegel, Honneth.Sinkwan Cheng - 2013 - _Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política _ 2:47-67.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
State Recognition between Justice and Efficiency.Frank Dietrich - 2013 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 21:187-203.
Institutional Legitimacy.N. P. Adams - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy:84-102.
Legitimacy is Not Authority.Jon Garthoff - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Recognition and Legitimacy: A Reply to Buchanan.Chris Naticchia - 1999 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 28 (3):242-257.
On the value of political legitimacy.Mathew Coakley - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (4):345-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?