Phenomenological Kaleidoscope

New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:16-41 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The main goal of this article is to examine Edmund Husserl’s method of “eidetic variation”—that is, to examine the way this method is supposed to work in connection with the notion of “similarity” (Ähnlichkeit). Unlike most interpretations, it will be suggested that similarity represents the leading methodologicalprinciple of eidetic variation. We will argue, therefore, that, on the one hand, this method is rooted in the sphere of association and passivity while, on the otherhand, it is constituted by the transposition of a passive synthesis into an active operation. After having introduced and discussed a twofold notion of phantasy(as “localized phantasy” and as “pure phantasy”) as well as a twofold concept of eidos (as “hen epi pollon” and as “pure eidos”), the extent to which for Husserl there cannot be any eidetic variation without a monadology will be shown.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

83 (#200,305)

6 months
16 (#219,535)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniele De De Santis
Charles University, Prague

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references