Recognition or Disagreement. A Critical Encounter on the Politics of Freedom, Equality, and Identity

Columbia University Press (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Axel Honneth is best known for his critique of modern society centered on a concept of recognition. Jacques Rancière has advanced an influential theory of modern politics based on disagreement. Underpinning their thought is a concern for the logics of exclusion and domination that structure contemporary societies. In a rare dialogue, these two philosophers explore the affinities and tensions between their perspectives to provoke new ideas for social and political change. Honneth sees modern society as a field in which the logic of recognition provides individuals with increasing possibilities for freedom and is a constant catalyst for transformation. Rancière sees the social as a policing order and the political as a force that must radically assert equality. Honneth claims Rancière's conception of the political lies outside of actual historical societies and involves a problematic desire for egalitarianism. Rancière argues that Honneth's theory of recognition relies on an overly substantial conception of identity and subjectivity. While impassioned, their exchange seeks to advance critical theory's political project by reconciling the rift between German and French post-Marxist traditions and proposing new frameworks for justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disagreement.Jonathan Matheson & Bryan Frances - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Moral disagreement and moral skepticism.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):302-333.
The Scientific and the Ethical.Bernard Williams - 1984 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 17:209-228.
Masking disagreement among experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.
Masking Disagreement among Experts.John Beatty - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):52-67.
Disagreement Without Error.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):143-154.
The many relativisms and the question of disagreement.Dan López de Sa - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):269 – 279.
Moral Disagreement among Philosophers.Ralph Wedgwood - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 23-39.
Hegelian recognition, critical theory, and the social sciences.Jean-Philippe Deranty - 2012 - In Nicholas Smith & Shane O'Neill (eds.), Recognition Theory as Social Research. Investigating the Dynamics of Social Conflict. Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-29

Downloads
7 (#1,360,984)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jean-Philippe Deranty
Macquarie University
Katia Genel
Université paris 1

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references