How are “interesting” research problems identified and made durable by academic researchers, particularly in situations defined by multiple evaluation principles? Building on two case studies of research groups working on rare diseases in academic biomedicine, we explore how group leaders arrange their groups to encompass research problems that latch onto distinct evaluation principles by dividing and combining work into “basic-oriented” and “clinical-oriented” spheres of inquiry. Following recent developments in the sociology of valuation comparing academics to capitalist entrepreneurs in pursuit of varying kinds of worth, we argue that the metaphor of the portfolio is helpful in analyzing how group leaders manage these different research lines as “alternative investment options” from which they were variously hoping to capitalize. We argue portfolio development is a useful concept for exploring how group leaders fashion “entrepreneurial” practices to manage and exploit tensions between multiple matrices of valuation and conclude with suggestions for how this vocabulary can further extend analysis of epistemic capitalism within science and technology studies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0162243918786431
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Renting Valuable Assets: Knowledge and Value Production in Academic Science.Clémence Pinel - 2021 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (2):275-297.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Group Problem Solving.Patrick R. Laughlin - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
The Responsible Conduct of Basic and Clinical Research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,552,677 of 2,519,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,756 of 2,519,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes