Clear . . . unclear? Accurate . . . inaccurate? Objective . . . subjective? Research . . . practice? Why polarities impede the research, practice and design of information systems and how Sense‐Making Methodology attempts to bridge the gaps. Part 1 [Book Review]

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):994-997 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Documentation in Practice-Led Research.Nithikul Nimkulrat - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (1):Article M6.
AI and law: What about the future? [REVIEW]Anja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter & Cees Groendijk - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):209-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#618,847)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Making sense of polarities in health organizations for policy and leadership.Carmel M. Martin - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):990-993.
Distortions, belief and sense making in complex adaptive systems for health.Carmel M. Martin - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):387-388.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references