Beyond “Wesenschau”

Dialogue and Universalism 28 (4):155-165 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the basic reasons for Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s critique of Edmund Husserl’s Wesenschau is represented by what has been defined as the “ambiguity” of the perceiver-perceived relationship, which is the theme of the “phenomenology of perception” developed by the French philosopher. Such ambiguity is in effect constitutive of fundamental perceptive-cognitive relationships; and—in the mature thought of Merleau-Ponty—it also extends, from an ontological point of view, to the “chair du monde” in which being and non-being, visible and invisible, are but two sides of the same “reality.” In this contribution we try to highlight the ambiguous characteristics of corporeal intentionality which render it incompatible with visual perception. And we propose both the necessity and the possibility of eliminating this incompatibility with a new phenomenological approach, which is also consistent with scientific “visualisation.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Významy a vrtochy „Wesen“, prakticky vzato.Erazim Kohak - 2007 - Reflexe: Filosoficky Casopis 32:65-74.
Eppur si vede!: Dialogo fra una poiana e un gatto.Giorgio Derossi - 2003 - Rivista di Estetica 43 (24):54-67.
DEROSSI G., "Maurice Merleau-Ponty".P. G. P. G. - 1966 - Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 58:154.
DEROSSI G., "Maurice Merleau-Ponty". [REVIEW]M. A. Raschini - 1966 - Giornale di Metafisica 21:745.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-14

Downloads
35 (#433,400)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references