Radical Nature: Consciousness All the Way Down. Integrating Different Worldviews on Mind and Body Through a Radical Revision of Ontology and Epistemology: Recognizing the Primacy of Process, Feeling, and Intersubjectivity

Dissertation, California Institute of Integral Studies (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cracking the "hard problem" in philosophy of mind---how consciousness is related to the physical world---will require a radical revision of ontology and epistemology. Success in solving the philosophical "mind-body problem" will depend on how well ontology naturalizes the mind while recognizing its irreducibility to matter. Success in developing a true science of consciousness will depend on how well epistemology integrates first-person subjectivity and second-person intersubjectivity with third-person objectivity. In both cases---ontology and epistemology---success will mean recognizing the primacy of process and intersubjective feeling. ;Ontology and epistemology are inseparable. To investigate and understand the nature of reality---specifically, the relation between mind and matter, subject and object---requires a radical revision of the metaphysical assumptions underlying the dominant worldview in contemporary philosophy and science, and a radical revision in our ways of knowing. ;The "mind-body problem" has been a perennial challenge in philosophy for hundreds of years, and is the key problem in contemporary philosophy of mind. Nearly two-hundred years ago, Schopenhauer called it the "world-knot," and recently David Chalmers called it the "hard problem." Various solutions have been proposed, the most dominant being: dualism, materialism, and idealism. Each of these "solutions" fails because of its own peculiar logical flaw. ;In dualism, it is the problem of interaction; in materialism, it is the problem of emergence; in idealism, it is the problem of emanation . Two other solutions have been offered: neutral monism and panpsychism. Neutral monism is problematic because it merely disguises the original "knot" by burying it. On examination, this position turns out to be either a form of panpsychism or to suffer from one or more of the problems of interaction, emergence, and emanation. ;According to this work, the most coherent solution to the mind-body problem is to be found in a version of panpsychism---called here "radical naturalism"---which asserts that both matter and consciousness "go all the way down" and are mutually co-creative. In short, matter itself is intrinsically sentient. The central claim of this thesis is that it is inconceivable that subjectivity could ever emerge or evolve from wholly objective, insentient matter-energy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reality bubbles:Can we know anything about the physical world?Christian de Quincey - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (8):94-101.
Husserl and the Mind–Body Problem.Emiliano Trizio - 2011 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:1-15.
Mind-body, body-mind: Two distinct problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
The Mind-Body Problem and Whitehead’s Nonreductive Monism.Anderson Weekes - 2012 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (9-10):40-66.
Rethinking nature: A hard problem within the hard problem.Gregg H. Rosenberg - 1996 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):76-88.
Matter and Mind: a philosophical inquiry.Mario Bunge - 2010 - Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
The Debate on the Problem of the Irreducibility of Mind.Chien-Chih Chi - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (9):147-163.
Chaos and Consciousness.David Vincent Newman - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Psi and the Problem of Consciousness.George Williams - 2013 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 34:259-284.
Spinoza and the Self-Overcoming of Solipsism.Brook Ziporyn - 2012 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):125 - 140.
The action of mind on body.David Randall Luce - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (2):171-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references