What's in a name for memory errors? Implications and ethical issues arising from the use of the term "false memory" for errors in memory for details

Ethics and Behavior 14 (3):201 – 233 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term "false memories" has been used to refer to suggestibility experiments in which whole events are apparently confabulated and in media accounts of contested memories of childhood abuse. Since 1992 psychologists have increasingly used the term "false memory" when discussing memory errors for details, such as specific words within word lists. Use of the term to refer to errors in details is a shift in language away from other terms used historically (e.g., "memory intrusions"). We empirically examine this shift in language and discuss implications of the new use of the term "false memories." Use of the term presents serious ethical challenges to the data-interpretation process by encouraging over-generalization and misapplication of research findings on word memory to social issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#225,534)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On the genesis of abstract ideas.M. I. Posner & S. W. Keele - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2p1):353-363.
Dynamic mental representations.Jennifer J. Freyd - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (4):427-438.
Relational Remembering: Rethinking the Memory Wars.Sue Campbell - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

View all 28 references / Add more references