Abstract

Saudi Arabia is a prolific writer, whose works include fiction, drama, essays, biography or philosophy regardless above. His existentialism in France after World War II champion unparalleled. Advocated by works of contemporary writers to the social, political events stand out is the ability of this "intervention" Concept of the knowledge management elements representative. But Saudi Arabia's political stance and practice often with his basic philosophy of contradictory theories, between the two can be balance? Regardless of the Saudi state has existential many, today we want to historian's angle to the future home thinking the other for the analysis of Saudi Arabia. Sartre was a prolific writer of novels, dramas, essays, biographical or philosophical essays. His existentialism was the most prominent school of thought in France after World War Ⅱ, contending that writers were supposed to express their opinions about the contemporary society and political events through their works. Sartre was the representative intellect who actually practiced such an idea of ​​participation. But while Sartre's political position and practice often contradicted the fundamental theories of his philosophy, could the former be in balance with the latter? There have been abundant researches Sartre's existentialism , and this paper is to analyze other aspects of Sartre's thought from the perspective of an historian