Ist die Wissenschaft das Maß aller Dinge? Eine phänomenologische Kritik an Sellars’ Ansatz

Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In view of the incompatibility between scientific and manifest image one can either consider the scientific world as true and the sensuous world as merely subjective or consider the latter as true and the former as a subjective construction. Sellars holds the first position, namely scientific realism. By relying on Husserl, who holds the second position, I try to show that the first position has absurd consequences and is idealistic. For the measure of all things is not science, but perception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,074

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wilfrid Sellars and Constructive Empiricism.John Dougherty - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):435-478.
Critique of Wilfrid Sellars' Materialism.Andrew Chrucky - 1990 - Dissertation, Fordham University
Subject and Object in Scientific Realism.Howard Sankey - 2017 - In Jassen Andreev, Emil Lensky & Paula Angelova (eds.), Das Interpretative Universum. Würzburg: Konigshausen & Neumann. pp. 293-306.
Realism.Hilary Putnam - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (2):117-131.
Sellars and the measure of all things.David Kolb - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (4):381 - 400.
Prospects for Reconciling Sellars' World Images.John Collier - 2010 - South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):343-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
37 (#621,794)

6 months
10 (#446,334)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references