Was Hayek a panglossian evolutionary theorist? A Reply to Whitman

Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By means of a consideration of Whitman (1998) the present paper considers the meanings of ‘Panglossianism’ and the relation between group and individual levels in evolution. It establishes the connection between the Panglossian policy prescription of laissez-faire and the mistaken evolutionary theory of group selection. Analysis of the passages in Hayek cited by Whitman shows that, once these passages are taken in context, and once the appropriate meaning of the term ‘Panglossian’ has been clarified, they fail to defend Hayek from this charge, but, on the contrary, confirm that Hayek was, indeed, ‘a Panglossian evolutionary theorist’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#503,056)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire.Andy Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.
Collective and individual rationality: Robert Malthus’s heterodox theodicy.A. Denis - 2003 - Department of Economics, City University London.
Two Rhetorical Strategies of Laissez-Faire.A. Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references