Was Adam Smith an individualist?

History of the Human Sciences 12 (3):71-86 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Smith is generally regarded as an individualist without qualification. This paper argues that his predominantly individualist policy prescription is rooted in a more complex philosophy. He sees nature, including human nature, as a vast machine supervised by God and designed to maximise human happiness. Human weaknesses, as well as strengths, display the wisdom of God and play their part in this scheme. While Smith pays lip service to justice, it is really social order that pre-occupies him, and within that, the defence of property. Individuals are valued as bearers of property. As persons, individuals are deceived by nature into acting in a socially beneficial way. In different ways Smith systematically denies the autonomy of the individual with respect to the whole of which he is part. For Smith, individual liberty is, not the end, but the means, of sustaining social order and property.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#244,525)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire.Andy Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.
Collective and individual rationality: Robert Malthus’s heterodox theodicy.A. Denis - 2003 - Department of Economics, City University London.
Two Rhetorical Strategies of Laissez-Faire.A. Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations