Seeing is Believing..

Abstract

We would all like to have a good theory of perception. Such a theory would account for all the known phenomena and predict novel phenomena, explaining everything in terms of processes occurring in nervous systems in accordance with the principles and laws already established by science: the principles of optics, physics, biochemistry, and the like. Such a theory might come to exist without our ever having to answer the awkward "philosophical" question that arises.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Seeing is believing--or is it?Daniel C. Dennett - 1996 - In Kathleen Akins (ed.), [Book Chapter]. Oxford University Press. pp. 158-172.
Believing in things.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):584–611.
On a causal theory of content.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1989 - Philosophical Perspectives 3:165-186.
Is seeing believing?Russell B. Goodman - 1974 - Proceedings of the New Mexico-West Texas Philosophical Society 40 (April):45.
Virtue ethics, theory, and warrant.Garrett Cullity - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):277-294.
In Defence of Believing Wishfully.Mark Mercer - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):211-224.
Moral Principles Are Not Moral Laws.Luke Robinson - 2007 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (3):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
72 (#223,508)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel C. Dennett
Tufts University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references