Response to De Caro, Lavazza, Lemos, and Pereboom

Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):274-283 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Author's reply to De Caro's, Lavazza's, Lemos', and Pereboom's comments on D.C. Dennett, Reflection on Sam Harris' "Free Will"

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.4453/rifp.2017.0023

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Siamo davvero liberi? - M. De Caro, A.Lavazza and G. Sartori. [REVIEW]Giuseppe Vicari - 2011 - Humana Mente 4 (15).
In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument.Daniel Haas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):797-811.
In defence of the Four-Case Argument.Benjamin Matheson - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1963-1982.
Mary's new perspective.Torin Alter - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):585-84.
Pereboom on the Frankfurt cases.David Palmer - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):261 - 272.
Organizational Ecology: No Darwinian Evolution After All. A Rejoinder to Lemos.Markus Scholz & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):504-512.
Hard- and soft-line responses to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument.Ishtiyaque Haji & Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (4):19 - 35.
On Pereboom’s Disappearing Agent Argument.Alfred R. Mele - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):561-574.
A Libertarian Response to Dennett and Harris on Free Will.John Lemos - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):231-246.
Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Michael McKenna - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):575-589.
In Defense of Avuncularity. Dennett and Harris on the Relation between Philosophy and Science.Mario De Caro - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):266-273.
The Timing Objection to the Frankfurt Cases.David Palmer - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1011-1023.
Extending Pereboom's Quarantine System.Nathan Houck - unknown
Rejecting Pereboom’s empirical objection to agent-causation.Jordan Baker - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):3085-3100.
Moral Concerns About Responsibility Denial and the Quarantine of Violent Criminals.John Lemos - 2016 - Law and Philosophy 35 (5):461-483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-31

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel C. Dennett
Tufts University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Response to Dennett on Free Will Skepticism.Derk Pereboom - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):259-265.

Add more references