Rousseau on amour-propre: N.j.H. Dent

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):57–74 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to familiar accounts, Rousseau held that humans are actuated by two distinct kinds of self love: amour de soi, a benign concern for one's self-preservation and well-being; and amour-propre, a malign concern to stand above other people, delighting in their despite. I argue that although amour-propre can (and often does) assume this malign form, this is not intrinsic to its character. The first and best rank among men that amour-propre directs us to claim for ourselves is that of occupying 'man's estate'. This does not require, indeed it precludes, subjection of others. Amour-propre does not need suppression or circumscription if we are to live good lives; it rather requires direction to its proper end, not a delusive one

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
143 (#110,795)

6 months
7 (#142,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references