Offensive defensive medicine: the ethics of digoxin injections in response to the partial birth abortion ban

Contraception 90 (3):304 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in 2007, more U.S. abortion providers have begun performing intraamniotic digoxin injections prior to uterine dilation and evacuations. These injections can cause medical harm to abortion patients. Our objective is to perform an in-depth bioethical analysis of this procedure, which is performed mainly for the provider’s legal benefit despite potential medical consequences for the patient.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
Notes on Propertius 4. 1 and 4. 4.J. L. Marr - 1970 - Classical Quarterly 20 (01):160-.
What's in a Name? The New York Times on "Partial-Birth" Abortion.Kenneth Woodward - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 19 (2):427-442.
Against Anonymity.Robert Baker - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (4):166-169.
The Viable Violinist.Michael Hawking - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (4):312-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-05

Downloads
515 (#34,529)

6 months
56 (#75,949)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Govind Persad
University of Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references