- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Uncommon Dissent: Intellectuals Who Find Darwinism Unconvincing
Isi Books (2004)
Abstract
Motto: “The purpose of freedom is to create it for others,” Bernard Malamud, The Fixer Dedication: To the memory of Michael Polanyi, for freeing inquiry from ideology..
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The right to dissent and its implications for schooling.Sarah M. Stitzlein - 2012 - Educational Theory 62 (1):41-58.
The equivalence of neo-darwinism and walrasian equilibrium: In defense of organismus economicus.Elias L. Khalil & Alain Marciano - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):229-248.
The Dissent over Dissent over Descent.Steve Fuller - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):479-503.
Common Good, Uncommon Questions: A Primer in Moral Theology.Timothy Backous & William C. Graham (eds.) - 1997 - Liturgical Press.
Dissent over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism. By Steve Fuller.Bradford McCall - 2011 - Heythrop Journal 52 (2):318-319.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
44 (#351,926)
6 months
3 (#1,023,809)
2009-01-28
Downloads
44 (#351,926)
6 months
3 (#1,023,809)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Is Intelligent Design the Answer to Darwinism? Marcos Eberlin’s Foresight and the Limits of Irreducible Complexity as Scientific Paradigm.Jason Michael Morgan - 2020 - Scientia et Fides 8 (2):393-402.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo