Obsolescence Is Not a Good Reason to Oppose All Types of Enhancement

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):49-50 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 19, Issue 7, July 2019, Page 49-50.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Addressing disadvantage and the human good.Jonathan Wolff - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3):207–218.
How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement.John Harris - 2016 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
Human nature and enhancement.Allen Buchanan - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (3):141-150.
Enhancement and Obsolescence: Avoiding an "Enhanced Rat Race".Robert Sparrow - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (3):231-260.
Which Enhancement? What Kind of Obsolescence?Ruth Chadwick - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):20-22.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.
Authenticity and Enhancement.Catherine Gee - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-26

Downloads
24 (#563,024)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Rational Freedom and Six Mistakes of a Bioconservative.Julian Savulescu - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):1-5.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement.John Harris - 2016 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.
Ethical issues in human enhancement.Nick Bostrom & Rebecca Roache - 2007 - In J. Ryberg, T. Petersen & C. Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 120--152.
What It’s Like to Be Good.John Harris - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (3):293-305.

View all 6 references / Add more references