Moral modesty, moral judgment and moral advice. A Wittgensteinian approach

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (1):20-37 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Moral philosophy has traditionally aimed for correct or appropriate moral judgments. Consequently, when asked for moral advice, the moral philosopher first tries to develop a moral judgment and then informs the advisee. The focus is on what the advisee should do, not on whether any advice should be given. There may, however, be various kinds of reasons not to morally judge, to be ‘morally modest’. In the first part of this article, I give some reasons to be morally modest when moral advice is asked for. Second, I show how Wittgenstein radicalizes these reasons to such an extent that the very possibility of giving moral advice seems threatened. Third, I argue that taking Wittgenstein and the need for moral modesty seriously does not make moral advice impossible, but rather asks for a notion of moral advice in which moral advice is not necessarily linked to the ideal of a moral judgment. Fourth, I highlight some advantages of a Wittgensteinian notion of moral advice over traditional notions.

Similar books and articles

Do Moral Questions Ask for Answers?Benjamin De Mesel - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):43-61.
How good is the linguistic analogy?Susan Dwyer - 2006 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--167.
Beyond moral judgment.Alice Crary - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Judgment, Deliberation, and the Self-effacement of Moral Theory.Damian Cox - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3):289-302.
What is Moral Reasoning?Leland F. Saunders - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (1):1-20.
Does Direct Moral Judgment Have a Phenomenal Essence?Joshua Glasgow - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (1):52-69.
Moral responsibility and "moral luck".Brian Rosebury - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (4):499-524.
After objectivity: An empirical study of moral judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):3 – 26.
Moral realism and moral judgments.Frederik Kaufman - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (1):103 - 112.


Added to PP

183 (#76,567)

6 months
73 (#20,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Culture and value.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1977 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by G. H. von Wright & Heikki Nyman.
Lecture on Ethics.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 2014 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Edoardo Zamuner.
Good and evil: an absolute conception.Raimond Gaita - 1991 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
What is wrong with moral testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.

View all 34 references / Add more references