Hume's Experimental Method

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (3):577-599 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I attempt to reconstruct David Hume's use of the label ?experimental? to characterise his method in the Treatise. Although its meaning may strike the present-day reader as unusual, such a reconstruction is possible from the background of eighteenth-century practices and concepts of natural inquiry. As I argue, Hume's inquiries into human nature are experimental not primarily because of the way the empirical data he uses are produced, but because of the way those data are theoretically processed. He seems to follow a method of analysis and synthesis quite similar to the one advertised in Newton's Opticks, which profoundly influenced eighteenth-century natural and moral philosophy. This method brings him much closer to the methods of qualitative, chemical investigations than to mechanical approaches to both nature and human nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-31

Downloads
98 (#172,331)

6 months
17 (#140,418)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tamas Demeter
Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume.Matias Slavov - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (3):275-296.
Prescription, Description, and Hume's Experimental Method.Hsueh Qu - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2):279-301.
Newton and Hume.Matias Kimi Slavov - 2020 - Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Hume.Barry Stroud - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (4):597-601.
Hume.Barry Stroud - 1977 - New York: Routledge.
Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment.Peter Hanns Reill - 2005 - University of California Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references