Embeddedness and social pluralism

Philosophia Reformata 78 (2):144-161 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines Karl Polanyi’s “double-movement thesis” and, in particular, his claim that modern economies are characterized by a dis-embedding of the economy from society. I examine two significant lines of criticism of this thesis: first, that the concept of “embeddedness” is incoherent in that it implies that economies both can and cannot become “dis-embedded” from society; second, that, though conceptually coherent, the concept does not supply adequate normative guidance for those seeking to address the economic and social problems that emerge from a “dis-embedded” economy. I argue that re-articulating the double-movement thesis in the terms of Reformational social philosophy can show how these problems can be resolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sources of Pluralism – Introduction.David M. Rasmussen - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5):339-345.
The populist threat to pluralism.Julian Baggini - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5):403-412.
What Makes a Fact Social? On the Embeddedness of Social Action.Joseph Lewandowski - 2002 - Existentia: An International Journal of Philosophy 12 (3–4):281-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
17 (#815,534)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

All Economies are "Embedded": The Career of a Concept, and Beyond.Bernard Barber - 1995 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 62.

Add more references