About the Unity of Power, Knowledge, Communication in M. Fuco’s “Archeological Search”

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:37-44 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mishel Fuco not only influenced the consciousness of modern West, but changed the modus of thinking, the way of perception of many traditional notions, transformed the opinions about the reality, history, person. Philosopher’s principle research programme which attaches the entirety to his works is “archeology of knowledge” programme, the search of human knowledge’s original layers. Let us mark that all Fuco’s works in 1960s are devoted to main aim: to clear up the conditions of historical origin of different mental aims and social institutions in the culture of the Modern Time. Though in the whole this common aim remained for Fuco invariable, but the level on which he realizes his research search is changing constantly and rather logically. Relations of power, and to be more exact,accumulations of power and knowledge, social and cognitive which define all the aggregate of specific possibilities of culture in each given historical period. More than that the philosopher offers the particular prospects of sight of modern society and precisely totality of power relations, its ubiquitous nature and specific productivity which produces itself in each moment in any point or rather in any attitude from one point to another. From Fuco’s point of view the power is everywhere and not because it involves everything but because it comes from everywhere. The power is productive in that degree in which it is not associated with one definite imperious instance but pierces all kinds of activity in society, putting on its indelible stamp, developing under definite angle and due to this factit causes products, produced by them. The power induces and at the same time determines the fact which appears as a result of its inducement. The thirst of supremacy, which surrounds the individual and is focused on it as on the center of its use of force, comes out as a defining sign. It should be noticed that Fuco’s conception of power is not reduced to the understanding it as anonymous impersonal net of relations, piercing all society. It is supplemented by power treatment,coming out in “designed” look of definite imperious structure or imperious institute.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche's Concept of Will-to-Power: A Critical Study.Pujarini Das - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Hyderabad
A global tradition? Power and historicity.Krzysztof Ziarek - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):103-120.
Foucault and Power Revisited.Nathan Widder - 2004 - European Journal of Political Theory 3 (4):411-432.
Post‐modernism, a French cultural Chernobyl: Foucault on power/knowledge.Robert Nola - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):3 – 43.
Power: A Philosophical Analysis.Peter Morriss - 1987 - New York: Manchester University Press.
Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernity.Ciaran Cronin - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Psychiatric power: lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-74.Michel Foucault - 2006 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. Edited by Jacques Lagrange.
Rousseau y el concepto de soberanía popular.Georg Zenkert - 2000 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 12 (2):81-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
26 (#574,431)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references