Parmenides, Plato, and Μίμησις.

In Heather Reid & Jeremy DeLong (eds.), The Many Faces of Mimesis: Selected Essays from the 2017 Symposium on the Hellenic Heritage of Western Greece (Heritage of Western Greece Series, Book 3). Sioux City, Iowa: Parnassos Press. pp. 61-74 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evidence for a Parmenidean influence on Plato’s Republic typically focuses on content from Bks. V-VI, and the development of Plato’s Theory of Forms. This essay aims to suggest that Plato’s censorship of poetic content in Bks. II-III—particularly the rules for portraying divine nature (376e-383c)—also draw heavily upon the Eleatic tradition, particularly Parmenides’s. Identifying this further Eleatic influence will be enhanced by my own reading of Parmenides. This reading advocates understanding Parmenides in a more Xenophanean-vein—i.e. by taking What-Is to be an explication of the essential qualities of divine nature, and the overall poem as rejecting traditional, mythopoetic accounts of divinity. Recognizing this Eleatic influence on the censorship of poetic content, a tension arises. For Plato infamously censors poetic styles next, concluding that mimetic dialogue may only be rarely employed, and only then in imitation of virtuous persons and actions (392c-398b). This would entail banning all poetic works relying exclusively on mimetic dialogue. Yet, not only do Plato’s own dialogues entirely consist of mimetic dialogue, so does Parmenides’s proto-dialogue. Furthermore, by so closely imitating Parmenides’s thought and language in Republic, has not Plato himself engaged in a type of intellectual and compositional mίμησις? Just as it would be strange to ban the very dialogue (Republic) which outlines and justifies Kallipolis in the first place, it would also be troubling to ban a philosophical work (i.e. Parmenides’s poem) which Republic is so heavily indebted to. Such a ban would also seem strongly at odds with Plato’s general reverence for Parmenides. In an attempt to address these tensions, I suggest that in Republic II-III, Plato’s lack of concern for banning philosophical works along with mimetic poetry should further suggest that he intends the ban to be far narrower than it first appears: as a rejection of performative, rather than compositional, mίμησις.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parmenides and Plato's Parmenides.J. M. Rist - 1970 - Classical Quarterly 20 (2):221-229.
Two recent interpretations of Plato's parmenides.Egil A. Wylter - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Plato's Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments.Sandra Lynne Peterson - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):167-192.
Becoming Socrates: Political Philosophy in Plato's Parmenides.Alex Priou - 2018 - Rochester, NY, USA: Rochester University Press.
Parmenides in Plato’s Parmenides.Andreas Graeser - 2000 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 5 (1):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-22

Downloads
419 (#42,831)

6 months
86 (#43,372)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy C. DeLong
Fort Hays State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Parmenides.John Palmer - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54:100-101.
Parmenides.John Palmer - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine.
Parmenides' Theistic Metaphysics.Jeremy C. DeLong - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Kansas

Add more references