Opening up for participation in agro-biodiversity conservation: The expert-lay interplay in a Brazilian social movement [Book Review]
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):559-577 (2008)
AbstractIn science and environmental studies, there is a general concern for the democratization of the expert-lay interplay. However, the democratization of expertise does not necessarily lead to more sustainable decisions. If citizens do not take the sustainable choice, what should experts and decision makers do? Should the expert-lay interplay be dissolved? In thinking about how to shape the expert-lay interplay in a better way in agro-biodiversity conservation, I take the case of the MST (Movimento Sem Terra/Landless People’s Movement), possibly the largest rural movement in Latin America. The MST is in a process of turning towards environmentalism. It has adopted agroecology, a democratically oriented knowledge field. However, not all of the farmers were willing to adopt new environmentalist ideas and practices. Through ethnographic research, I analyze how expertise was recognized and redistributed within the MST, attending particularly to the role of MST coordinators and technicians. I explore how participation was framed and put into action. The adoption of agroecology brought to the MST a new and more inclusive map of expertise, but it also influenced new social distinctions within the communities. In part, farmers’ knowledge was labeled as ignorance. This may close down possibilities for dialogue as well as for sustainability. The paper suggests that experts’ power for discriminating among lay knowledges should come together with a responsibility for opening spaces for dialogue and action. One way of doing so could be by adding “interactional reflexivity” to experts’ expertise.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Considerations in Agro-biodiversity Research, Collecting, and Use.Johannes M. M. Engels, Hannes Dempewolf & Victoria Henson-Apollonio - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):107-126.
Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise. [REVIEW]Harry Collins & Martin Weinel - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):401-413.
The Epistemic Authority of Expertise.Robert Pierson - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:398 - 405.
Idealizing science and demonizing experts: An intellectual history of expert evidence.Jennifer Mnookin - manuscript
Expertise and public ignorance.Evan M. Selinger - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):375-386.
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry.Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):297-312.
Whom to trust? Public concerns, late modern risks, and expert trustworthiness.Geert Munnichs - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):113-130.
Consensus of expertise: The role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts.Robert M. Veatch - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The cultural politics of the agroecological transition.David Meek - 2016 - Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2):275-290.
References found in this work
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences Into Democracy.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Harvard University Press.
Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development.Alan Irwin - 1995 - Routledge.
Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology.Alan Irwin & Brian Wynne (eds.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.