How can contributors to open-source communities be Trusted? On the assumption, inference, and substitution of trust

Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):327-341 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open-source communities that focus on content rely squarely on the contributions of invisible strangers in cyberspace. How do such communities handle the problem of trusting that strangers have good intentions and adequate competence? This question is explored in relation to communities in which such trust is a vital issue: peer production of software (FreeBSD and Mozilla in particular) and encyclopaedia entries (Wikipedia in particular). In the context of open-source software, it is argued that trust was inferred from an underlying ‘hacker ethic’, which already existed. The Wikipedian project, by contrast, had to create an appropriate ethic along the way. In the interim, the assumption simply had to be that potential contributors were trustworthy; they were granted ‘substantial trust’. Subsequently, projects from both communities introduced rules and regulations which partly substituted for the need to perceive contributors as trustworthy. They faced a design choice in the continuum between a high-discretion design (granting a large amount of trust to contributors) and a low-discretion design (leaving only a small amount of trust to contributors). It is found that open-source designs for software and encyclopaedias are likely to converge in the future towards a mid-level of discretion. In such a design the anonymous user is no longer invested with unquestioning trust.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Trusting virtual trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.
The institutionalization of Open Source.Robert A. Gehring - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):54-73.
Trust in Strangers, Trust in Friends.Jessica Miller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):17-22.
The Decline of Trust, The Decline of Democracy?Patti Tamara Lenard - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (3):363-378.
Evoking trust in the nutrition counselor: Why should we be Trusted? [REVIEW]Jacqui Gingras - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):57-74.
Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-12

Downloads
90 (#138,486)

6 months
7 (#117,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. De Laat
University of Groningen

References found in this work

Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
Trust, hope and empowerment.Victoria McGeer - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):237 – 254.
The Cunning of Trust.Philip Pettit - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (3):202-225.
The Cunning of Trust.Philip Perth - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (3):202-225.
Trusting virtual trust.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):167-180.

View all 13 references / Add more references