Health Care Analysis 18 (2):164-174 (2010)
AbstractMost models of patient-physician communication take decision-making as a central concept. However, we found that often the treatment course of metastatic cancer patients is not easy to describe in straightforward terms used in decision-making models but is instead frequently more erratic. Our aim was to analyse these processes as trajectories. We used a longitudinal case study of 13 patients with metastatic colorectal and pancreatic cancer for whom palliative chemotherapy was a treatment option, and analysed 65 semi-structured interviews. We analysed three characteristics of the treatment course that contributed to the ‘erraticness’ of the course: (1) The treatment (with or without chemotherapy) contained many options; (2) these options were not stable entities to be decided upon, but changed identity over the course of treatment, and (3) contrary to the closure (option X means no option Y, Z, etc.) a decision implies, the treatment course was a continuous process in which options instead remained open. When the treatment course is characterised by these many and changeable options that do not result in closure, the shared decision-making model should take these into account. More attention needs to be paid to the erratic character of the process in which the doctor has to provide continuous information that is related to the changing situation of the patient; also, flexibility in dealing with protocols is warranted, as is vigilance about the overall direction of the process
Similar books and articles
The Medical Decision-Making Process and the Family: The Case of Breast Cancer Patients and Their Husbands.Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
The Potential Impact of Decision Role and Patient Age on End-of-Life Treatment Decision Making.B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, H. P. Lacey & A. Fagerlin - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):327-331.
Use of a Patient Preference Predictor to Help Make Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients.A. Rid & D. Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):104-129.
Medical Decision-Making and Communication of Risks: An Ethical Perspective.C. Breitsameter - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):349-352.
Shared Decision-Making, Gender and New Technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point. [REVIEW]Nanon Labrie - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):171-199.
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Treatment Decision Making for Incapacitated Patients: Is Development and Use of a Patient Preference Predictor Feasible?Annette Rid & David Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):130-152.
Deciding Together? Best Interests and Shared Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care.Giles Birchley - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (3):203-222.
Information and Participation in Decision-Making About Treatment: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions and Preferences of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.J. Schildmann, M. Grunke, J. R. Kalden & J. Vollmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):775-779.
Can Curative or Life-Sustaining Treatment Be Withheld or Withdrawn? The Opinions and Views of Indian Palliative-Care Nurses and Physicians.Joris Gielen, Sushma Bhatnagar, Seema Mishra, Arvind K. Chaturvedi, Harmala Gupta, Ambika Rajvanshi, Stef Van den Branden & Bert Broeckaert - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):5-18.
Ethical Dilemmas in the Care of Patients with Incurable Cancer.M. Kuuppelomäki & S. Lauri - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (4):294-306.
Adherence, Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman, Bradi B. Granger, Inger Ekman & Christian Munthe - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):115-127.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Situations of Choice: Configuring the Empowered Consumer of Hearing Technologies. [REVIEW]Anette Lykke Hindhede - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (3):221-237.
The ‘Empowered Client’ in Vocational Rehabilitation: The Excluding Impact of Inclusive Strategies.Lineke Be van Hal, Agnes Meershoek, Frans Nijhuis & Klasien Horstman - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (3):213-230.
The 'Empowered Client' in Vocational Rehabilitation: The Excluding Impact of Inclusive Strategies. [REVIEW]Lineke B. E. Hal, Agnes Meershoek, Frans Nijhuis & Klasien Horstman - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (3):213-230.
References found in this work
What Do Patients Value in Their Hospital Care? An Empirical Perspective on Autonomy Centred Bioethics.S. Joffe - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):103-108.
Cancer Patients’ Views and Experiences of Participation in Care and Decision Making.Carita Sainio, Sirkka Lauri & Elina Eriksson - 2001 - Nursing Ethics 8 (2):97-113.