Science in Context 27 (4):709-44 (2014)

Abstract
This paper aims at contributing to the ongoing efforts to get a firmer grasp of the systematic significance of the entanglement of idealism and empiricism in Helmholtz's work. Contrary to existing analyses, however, the focal point of the present exposition is Helmholtz's attempt to articulate a psychological account of objectification. Helmholtz's motive, as well as his solution to the problem of the object are outlined, and interpreted against the background of his scientific practice on the one hand, and that of empiricist and (transcendental) idealist analyses of experience on the other. The specifically psychological angle taken, not only prompts us to consider figures who have hitherto been treated as having only minor import for Helmholtz interpretation (most importantly J.S. Mill and J.G. Fichte), it furthermore sheds new light on some central tenets of the latter's psychological stance that have hitherto remained underappreciated. For one thing, this analysis reveals an explicit voluntarist tendency in Helmholtz's psychological theory. In conclusion, it is argued that the systematic significance of Helmholtz's empirico-transcendentalism with respect to questions of the mind is best understood as an attempt to found his empirical theory of perception in a second order, normative account of epistemic subjectivity.
Keywords Psychology  History of psychology  Hermann von Helmholtz  subjectivity  perception
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S026988971400026X
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.Peter Galison & David Stump (eds.) - 1996

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Helmholtz on Perceptual Properties.R. Brian Tracz - 2018 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6 (3).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Spatial Perception and Geometry in Kant and Helmholtz.Gary Hatfield - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:569 - 587.
Ewald Hering und die Gegenfarbtheorie.Michael Busse & Änne Bäumer-Schleinkofer - 1996 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 4 (1):159-172.
The Facts in Perception.Hermann von Helmholtz - 1977 - In Robert Cohen & Elkana Yehuda (eds.), Hermann Von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Reidel. pp. 115-185.
What Does It Mean That “Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So”?: Helmholtz’s Claim in Context.Francesca Biagioli - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-19

Total views
23 ( #489,721 of 2,498,019 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,501 of 2,498,019 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes