The case for a notation-independent representation of number

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):333 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cohen Kadosh & Walsh (CK&W) neglect the solid empirical evidence for a convergence of notation-specific representations onto a shared representation of numerical magnitude. Subliminal priming reveals cross-notation and cross-modality effects, contrary to CK&W's prediction that automatic activation is modality and notation-specific. Notation effects may, however, emerge in the precision, speed, automaticity, and means by which the central magnitude representation is accessed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,316

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Expertise in symbol-referent mapping.Roland H. Grabner - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):338-339.
Abstract or not? Insights from priming.Bert Reynvoet & Karolien Notebaert - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):349 - 350.
Common mistakes about numerical representations.Mauro Pesenti & Michael Andres - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):346-347.
Abstract or not abstract? Well, it depends….Alison Pease, Alan Smaill & Markus Guhe - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):345-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
76 (#230,663)

6 months
7 (#584,995)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Abstract.[author unknown] - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):299-303.
Abstract.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):447-449.

Add more references