In defense of learning by selection: Neurobiological and behavioral evidence revisited

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):560-561 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Quartz & Sejnowski's constructivist manifesto promotes a return to an extreme form of empiricism. In defense of learning by selection, we argue that at the neurobiological level all the data presented by Q&S in support of their constructive model are in fact compatible with a model comprising multiple overlapping stages of synaptic overproduction and selection. We briefly review developmental studies at the behavioral level in humans providing evidence in favor of a selectionist view of development

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neural models of development and learning.Stephen Grossberg - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):566-566.
Evolution might select constructivism.James Hurford, Sam Joseph, Simon Kirby & Alastair Reid - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):567-568.
The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems.Thomas C. Kane, Robert C. Richardson & Daniel W. Fong - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:151-164.
Selection in operant learning may fit a general model.Julian C. Leslie - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.
Selection without multiple replicators?John W. Pepper & Thorbjørn Knudsen - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):550-551.
Learning is remembering.George Székely - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):577-578.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references