The rift in the lute: attuning poetry and philosophy

Oxford University Press (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is it for poetry to be serious and to be taken seriously? What is it to be open to poetry, exposed to its force, attuned to what it says and alive to what it does? These are important questions that call equally on poetry and philosophy. But poetry and philosophy, notoriously, have an ancient quarrel. Maximilian de Gaynesford sets out to understand and convert their mutual antipathy into something mutually enhancing, so that we can begin to answer these and other questions. The key to attuning poetry and philosophy lies in the fact that poetic utterances are best appreciated as doing things. For it is as doing things that the speech act approach in analytic philosophy of language tries to understand all utterances. Taking such an approach, this book offers ways to enhance our appreciation of poetry and to develop our understanding of philosophy. It explores work by a range of poets from Chaucer to Geoffrey Hill and J. H. Prynne, and culminates in an extended study of Shakespeare's Sonnets. What work does poetry set itself, and how does this determine the way it is to be judged? What do poets commit themselves to, and what they may be held responsible for? What role does a poet have, or their audience, or their context, in determining the meaning of a poem, what work it is able to achieve? These are the questions that an attuned approach is able to ask and answer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Introduction: What is Attunement?

Attunement is a mutually shaping approach in which we analyse material in genuinely philosophical ways, with the prospect of changing the way we think about things in general; in really appreciating poetry and adopting a genuinely critical approach, with the prospect of changing the way we... see more

Austin’s Remarks

J. L. Austin makes several remarks that seem to reflect antipathy towards poetry. He describes poetic utterances as ‘non-serious’ and represents poetry itself as a non-serious use of language. He does not argue for these claims or clarify his meaning. Though his tone is light, the curiousl... see more

Similar books and articles

Orpheus with His Lute: Poetry and the Renewal of Life by Elisabeth Henry. [REVIEW]Betty Nagle - 1994 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 87:512-513.
The Performative Limits of Poetry.Christopher Mole - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):55-70.
The Philosophy of Poetry.John Gibson (ed.) - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Affirmation of Poetry.Drew S. Burk (ed.) - 2014 - Univocal Publishing.
Speech acts and poetry.Maximilian De Gaynesford - 2010 - Analysis 70 (4):644 - 646.
Mystique Poetica: Living Philosophy Through Revealed Wisdom.John Bright-Fey - 1998 - Rubrica Press. Edited by Charlie Fechter.
Attuning and Transformation.Gail Stenstad - 1991 - Heidegger Studies 7:75-88.
Hearing Meaning and Poetry: An Interview with Angela Leighton.Karen Simecek - 2012 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 9 (3):3-14.
Deliberate wrong-doing.Alan Montefiore - 2002 - Think 1 (2):47-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max De Gaynesford
University of Reading

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references