Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: a Response to Krahmer et al

Cognitive Science 36 (5):842-845 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.’s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. We observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from ‘‘normal” (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utility-Based Generation of Referring Expressions.Markus Guhe - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):306-329.
Utility and Language Generation: The Case of Vagueness.Kees van Deemter - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):607 - 632.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-02

Downloads
76 (#161,119)

6 months
2 (#298,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?