Hypatia 27 (3):527-545 (2012)

Abstract
Posthumanist feminist theory has been instrumental in demonstrating the salience of gender and sexism in structuring human–animal relationships and in revealing the connections between the oppression of women and of nonhuman animals. Despite the richness of feminist posthumanist theorizations it has been suggested that their influence in contemporary animal ethics has been muted. This marginalization of feminist work—here, in its posthumanist version—is a systemic issue within theory and needs to be remedied. At the same time, the limits of posthumanist feminist theory must also be addressed. Although posthumanist feminist theory has generated a sophisticated body of work analyzing how gendered and sexist discourses and practices subordinate women and animals alike, its imprint in producing intersectional analyses of animal issues is considerably weaker. This leaves theorists vulnerable to charges of essentialism, ethnocentrism, and elitism despite best intentions to avoid such effects and despite commitments to uproot all forms of oppression. Gender-focused accounts also preclude understanding of the importance of race and culture in structuring species-based oppression. To counter these undesirable pragmatic and conceptual developments, posthumanist feminist theory needs to engender feminist accounts that centralize the structural axes of race and culture
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01290.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left.Will Kymlicka & Sue Donaldson - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (1):116-135.
Anthropocentrism in Climate Ethics and Policy.Katie McShane - 2016 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):189-204.
School Lunch is Not a Meal: Posthuman Eating as Folk Phenomenology.Bradley Rowe & Samuel Rocha - 2015 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 51 (6):482-496.
A Feminist Posthumanist Multispecies Ethnography for Educational Studies.Teresa Lloro-Bidart - 2018 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 54 (3):253-270.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams.Maurice Hamington (ed.) - 2010 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-05-01

Total views
85 ( #130,208 of 2,462,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,590 of 2,462,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes