The Aesthetic and Cognitive Value of Surprise

Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 6:52-69 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is a common experience to be surprised by an artwork. In this paper, I examine how and why this obvious fact matters for philosophical aesthetics. Following recent works in psychology and philosophers such as Davidson or Scheffler, we will see that surprise qualifies as an emotion of a special kind, essentially “cognitive” or “epistemic” in its nature and functioning. After some preliminary considerations, I wish to hold two general claims: the first one will be that surprise is somehow related to aesthetic appreciation, because it is often the ground to judge of a work’s value. The second point will be that a functional analysis of surprise provides support for cognitivist accounts of aesthetics. If this picture is right, surprise would generally play an important part in aesthetic experience and should also be seen as a paradigm to study the cognitive powers of art.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Surprise: A Circular Dynamic of Multi-Directional Verbalization.Natalie Depraz - 2018 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 26 (1):21-37.
The Relationship Between Aesthetic Value and Cognitive Value.Antony Aumann - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2):117-127.
How can you be surprised? The case for volatile expectations.Roberto Casati & Elena Pasquinelli - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):171-183.
Surprise, Recipes for Surprise, and Social Influence.Jeffrey Loewenstein - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (1):178-193.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
The Psychology Of Kant’s Aesthetics.Paul Guyer - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):483-494.
The argument from surprise.Adrian Currie - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):639-661.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-10

Downloads
432 (#43,101)

6 months
121 (#28,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexandre Declos
Université de Neuchâtel

Citations of this work

What is the Uncanny? A Philosophical Enquiry.Mark Windsor - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Kent

Add more citations

References found in this work

Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.
Rational animals.Donald Davidson - 1982 - Dialectica 36 (4):317-28.

View all 13 references / Add more references