Service robotics: do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment

Poiesis and Praxis 8 (1):25-44 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Service-Robotic—mainly defined as “non-industrial robotics”—is identified as the next economical success story to be expected after robots have been ubiquitously implemented into industrial production lines. Under the heading of service-robotic, we found a widespread area of applications reaching from robotics in agriculture and in the public transportation system to service robots applied in private homes. We propose for our interdisciplinary perspective of technology assessment to take the human user/worker as common focus. In some cases, the user/worker is the effective subject acting by means of and in cooperation with a service robot; in other cases, the user/worker might become a pure object of the respective robotic system, for example, as a patient in a hospital. In this paper, we present a comprehensive interdisciplinary framework, which allows us to scrutinize some of the most relevant applications of service robotics; we propose to combine technical, economical, legal, philosophical/ethical, and psychological perspectives in order to design a thorough and comprehensive expert-based technology assessment. This allows us to understand the potentials as well as the limits and even the threats connected with the ongoing and the planned implementation of service robots into human lifeworld—particularly of those technical systems displaying increasing grades of autonomy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Service robots in the mirror of reflective research.Michael Decker - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (3-4):181-200.
Robots and cyborgs: to be or to have a body?Emma Palese - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (4):191-196.
Service, quality and human factors.Colin G. Drury - 2003 - AI and Society 17 (2):78-96.
AI armageddon and the three laws of robotics.Lee McCauley - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):153-164.
A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology.David Wright - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):199-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-03

Downloads
48 (#322,994)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research.Karl F. MacDorman & Hiroshi Ishiguro - 2006 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 7 (3):297-337.
What should we want from a robot ethic.Peter M. Asaro - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12):9-16.

Add more references