Free speech and offensive expression

Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):81-103 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Free speech has historically been viewed as a special and preferred democratic value in the United States, by the public as well as by the legislatures and courts. In 1937, Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote in Palko v. Connecticut that protection of speech is a “fundamental” liberty due to America's history, political and legal, and he recognized its importance, saying, “[F]reedom of thought and speech” is “the matrix, the indispensable condition, of nearly every other form of freedom.” It is likely notable that in the Bill of Rights free speech is protected in the First Amendment rather than later

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free speech and illocution.Rae Langton & Jennifer Hornsby - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (1):21-37.
What is Free Speech?David Braddon-Mitchell & Caroline West - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):437-460.
The Free Speech Argument against Pornography.Caroline West - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):391 - 422.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#161,390)

6 months
29 (#102,713)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Judith W. DeCew
Clark University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references