Constitutional Privacy, Judicial Interpretation, and Bowers v. Hardwick

Social Theory and Practice 15 (3):285-303 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0037802X

DOI

10.5840/soctheorpract198915314

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why plessy/brown and bowers/lawrence are correct: Thomistic natural law as the content of a moral constitutional interpretation.Patrick J. Glen - unknown
The aretaic turn in constitutional theory.Lawrence B. Solum - 2005 - Brooklyn Law Review 70:475.
Aids and Bowers V. Hardwick.Christine Pierce - 1989 - Journal of Social Philosophy 20 (3):21-32.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
The constitutional court's decision in the dispute between the supreme court and the judicial commission: Banishing judicial accountability?Simon Butt - unknown
Constitutional democracy and the legitimacy of judicial review.Samuel Freeman - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (4):327 - 370.
Privacy in puerto Rico and the madman's plight: Decisions.Hiram Melendez-Juarbe - unknown
Defending the “private” in constitutional privacy.Judith W. Decew - 1987 - Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (3):171-184.
Cruzan and the constitutionalization of american life.Carl E. Schneider - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):589-604.
Beguiled by Metaphors: The ‘Living Tree’ and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada.Bradley Miller - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (2):331-354.
We are all judicial activists now.Robert Justin Lipkin - unknown
The challenge of originalism: theories of constitutional interpretation.Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clarifying departmentalism: How the framers' vision of judicial and presidential review makes the case for deductive judicial supremacy.David W. Tyler - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
18 (#127,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Judith W. DeCew
Clark University

Citations of this work

Privacy.Judith DeCew - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Introduction: Technology and New Challenges for Privacy.Leslie P. Francis - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (3):291-303.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references