Christianity and Ecological Ethics: The Significance of Process Thought and a Panexperientialist Critique of Strong Anthropocentrism

Ecotheology 9:359-387 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christianity has contributed to the development of a strong anthropocentric ethic. Christian theologians have developed new ways of thinking about the place of humans in nature, often by focussing on the Godhumanity relationship. Thinking about the third component of the metaphysical trinity, nature, has largely remained unchanged. Christian theology needs to make an ontological detour or tour de force to overcome lingering materialist and dualist conceptions of nature, and to embrace key aspects of process thought, most notably panexperientialism. This will pave the way for the required weak anthropocentric ethic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering St. Thomas's Ecological Ethics.Pan-Chiu Lai & Tao Wang - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (11):155-173.
Toward the Ecological Reformation of Christianity.James A. Nash - 1996 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 50 (1):5-15.
Ecological Ethics.L. I. Vasilenko - 1998 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 37 (3):19-26.
The Environment and Christian Ethics.Michael S. Northcott - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ecological ethics-From naturalism to philosophical personalism.L. I. Vasilenko - 1998 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 37 (3):19-26.
Daoist Ecological and Environmental Ethics.Yeh Hai-yen - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (9):814-823.
Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem.Tim Hayward - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (1):49 - 63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-07

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Are scientists right and non-scientists wrong? Reflections on discussions of GM.Jan Deckers - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5):451-478.
Toward a weak anthropocentrism.Stephen H. Webb - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):761-763.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references